[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
Community Boards Approve Kennedy and LaGuardia Airport LeaseExtensions
December 29, 2003
Community Boards Approve Airport Lease Extensions
Queens Chronicle, NY
Southeast Queens’ community boards gave the green light last week to a
city proposal that would extend the Port Authority’s lease on Kennedy and
LaGuardia Airports.
But Community Boards 12 and 13 also raised concerns about overdevelopment
and a $50-million fund that the Port Authority earmarked for Queens capital
projects. The boards are also asking the authority and the city to give the
community greater input on future airport-related decisions.
“There are some very significant issues related to quality of life,
congestion, traffic, pollution and the environment,” said Richard
Hellenbrecht, chairman of Community Board 13. “We have established a
resolution supporting the new airport lease, but listing 10 or 11 conditions,
many of them dealing with the protection of the natural areas.”
In October, Governor Pataki and Mayor Bloomberg announced that the city and
the Port Authority renegotiated the leases for the two Queens airports, a
breakthrough that had been sought for a decade.
The Port Authority agreed to pay a total of $700 million, including a
$500-million lump sum and a $90-million-per-year increase over the current
$3.5-million annual lease payment.
The deal includes the establishment of an Airport Board—comprised of
unspecified city and Port Authority officials—to review operations, as well
as $10 million for each of five years for capital projects in Queens.
In exchange for a lease that extends through 2050, the authority also asked
for three parcels of city-owned land in and around the airport for navigational
and other airport equipment.
The land will “assure certainty about the future administration of the
airports” and allow the Port Authority and its subtenants to “undertake
improvements,” according to the official proposal. The parcels include a
120-acre site to the east of Runway 4R-22 Left and a smaller site to the south
of Aqueduct Raceway.
In its resolution approving the lease extension, Community Board 13
recommended that the 120-acre site be permanently designated as
security-sensitive, while the land near Aqueduct be limited to parking.
In addition, the board asked that city-owned properties on Rockaway
Boulevard between Springfield and Brookville Parks be “immediately designated
as parkland,” and restored with natural vegetation. The city had been
planning to sell some of the land for a strip mall.
“We are asking, as part of the $50-million capital program included in the
lease, that the city set aside some of those areas that are a buffer between
the airport and the community,” Hellenbrecht said. “That would preserve the
traffic that currently exists on Rockaway Boulevard, and not make it any
worse.”
Community Board 12, which unanimously approved the lease extension, focused
its concerns on the maintenance of the AirTrain corridor and representation on
the Airport Board.
“In view of the fact that the AirTrain is mostly in Board 12, we
recommended that the Airport Board be expanded to include one community board
representative,” said board Chairwoman Gloria Black.
Community Board 13, by contrast, would like the Airport Board to include the
Queens Borough President and one city councilmember.
Community Board 12 also asked that the Port Authority extend its commitment
to maintain the vicinity of the AirTrain indefinitely (the current obligation
expires in 2006), and that lighting in one AirTrain tunnel on 143rd Street be
improved.
In addition, both community boards want some say on how the $50 million
earmarked for Queens capital projects are spent.
The Port Authority did not return a call for comment on the boards’
suggestions, but a spokeswoman for the city’s Economic Development
Corporation—which controls most of the city-owned land near Kennedy
Airport—said that the lease expansion provides substantial benefits to the
area.
“It secures a fair rental payment to the city while giving us a
significant role in planning for the growth and management of both JFK and
LaGuardia Airports,” Janel Patterson said. “We are aware of Community Board
13’s concerns. We will give the board’s input serious consideration as we
move through the process.”
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/dc/dcboard.php
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com