[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Discounters' determination to grow is likely to shrink fares"
Title: Message
Friday, August 8, 2003
Discounters' determination to grow
is likely to shrink fares
By Marilyn Adams
USA TODAY
Atlantans
have seen what low-fare air service can do to prices. Four months ago, a
non-stop Atlanta-to-Los Angeles flight bought at the last minute ran a stunning
$2,221 round-trip because only Delta Air Lines flew it.
Now that
discounters AirTran Airways and JetBlue have jumped into that route, a
last-minute round-trip seat goes for as little as $403, one-fifth the old price.
If the expansion plans of three leading discount airlines succeed, fares on
hundreds of air routes nationwide are in for the same kind of breathtaking
fall.
Big aircraft orders by AirTran, JetBlue and Southwest mean that
cities and routes that have never been reached by low-fare carriers will get new
discount service in the next five years. The hundreds of jets on order won't
carry executives to Hong Kong or families to London. These three carriers see
their future in short- and long-haul domestic routes where fares are high and
fliers fed up.
These discounters won't be taking on just the major,
high-cost airlines as before. Regional carriers serving midsize cities — until
now insulated from low-fare competition — are being targeted for the first
time.
Air Tran, JetBlue and Southwest are only three of the nation's
discount carriers, but they're the healthiest and fastest-growing. Southwest,
the biggest discount airline, with 379 jets, is taking 42 new planes next year
and more than 20 a year after that. JetBlue and AirTran are poised to double
their fleets in five years. Even as traditional carriers American, Delta,
Northwest and United are losing billions of dollars and shrinking schedules to
cut costs, those low-fare carriers remain profitable.
Growth
opportunities abound. Those three airlines, with fellow low-fare carriers
America West, ATA, Frontier, Spirit and Sun Country, control a quarter of the
domestic market. In five years, the cities that have low-fare service will
outnumber those that don't, predicts AirTran executive Kevin Healy.
Some
cities gaining low-fare service might be big markets that discounters wouldn't
have touched a few years ago. Then, dominant carriers were too strong and had a
stranglehold on airport gates, which they could hold for years even if they
didn't use them. As the big airlines have cut back, some gates are being freed
up or airport leases rewritten to leave room for competition. Now, one or more
of the three discounters are publicly expressing interest in once-impenetrable
hub airports for United, Delta, Northwest and US Airways. They potentially
include Chicago O'Hare, Minneapolis, Detroit, Charlotte, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati
and Memphis, some of the most costly air markets in the nation for
fliers.
JetBlue CEO David Neeleman calls these cities "pockets of
pain."
Minnesotans know the price of living in a city without enough
low-fare service: It's $1,634 round-trip non-stop to New York for a business
traveler booking at the last minute, and $2,106 non-stop to Los Angeles
round-trip. Despite some recent inroads by discounters, Minneapolis is still 82%
controlled by hometown giant Northwest Airlines, and it shows.
"We're
stuck — they are the only game in town," says Ross Dahlin, a general manager for
Andersen Windows, based in Bayport, Minn.
"Minneapolis is one market
that's screaming for low-fare service," says analyst Jim Parker, who closely
tracks discount airlines for Raymond James Financial.
St. Louis is
suddenly on the discounters' radar screen, too. When American Airlines recently
announced that to cut losses, it's cutting in half the St. Louis hub it bought
from TWA, AirTran and JetBlue immediately showed interest. Southwest, which
already flies there, said it will expand.
But there are big risks with
these big aircraft orders and the rapid expansion they'll fuel, such as new
debt, labor tensions, cost increases and the pressures of adding planes and
pilots. Eventually, discount airlines accustomed to competing against high-cost
traditional airlines will begin competing directly against each other on more
routes. Discounters also will see competition from new low-fare subsidiaries of
Delta and United.
"They are going to begin treading on each other's
toes," says aviation consultant Morten Beyer. "There's a risk they'll lose
control of the process."
Says AirTran CEO Joe Leonard: "This (jet order)
is a big deal for us, and it's a little scary, too."
AirTran: Girding for
long-haul
The jets each airline has ordered will determine where they go.
AirTran, which flies mainly out of Atlanta to cities in the East, has ordered 50
Boeing 737-700 jets with options for another 50, and deliveries start next
summer. If all option planes are bought, the airline's fleet will more than
double by 2008.
CEO Leonard says he expects the airline to buy at least
85 planes. Although the 737-700 would allow AirTran to fly to Canada, Mexico and
the Caribbean, those leisure destinations don't appear to be high on its
list.
Leonard says he expects to start service to three to five new
cities a year. If recent actions are a guide, AirTran can be expected to expand
at Atlanta Hartsfield, which is adding a fifth runway, and Baltimore-Washington
International, where AirTran is now the second-biggest behind Southwest. It's
also expected to launch more transcontinental flights and enter more
historically high-fare cities in the Northeast and Midwest.
Leonard notes
that the Upper Midwest is still hurting for discount air service in cities such
as Minneapolis, Detroit, Chicago O'Hare and Milwaukee, some of which AirTran
already serves. Earlier this year, AirTran began transcontinental service with
non-stop Atlanta-Denver service in May and Atlanta-Las Vegas in
June.
AirTran is expected to launch more long-haul routes, but they won't
necessarily come without a fight. When JetBlue and AirTran started the
Atlanta-Los Angeles service this spring, Atlanta-based Delta dropped fares,
raised its Los Angeles service to 13 daily flights from eight and offered
passengers triple frequent-flier miles. Stung by the response, JetBlue dropped
two of its three Los Angeles flights and started Atlanta-Oakland flights
instead.
JetBlue: Eyeing smaller markets
New York-based JetBlue,
which flies 42 Airbus A320s today, has ordered 100 Embraer 100-seat jets and has
the option to buy up to another 100. It will get the first seven in 2005 and
another 18 a year for the next six years. If JetBlue buys all those planes and
other Airbus jets it has options on, its fleet could grow to 290 planes by the
end of 2011.
Today, JetBlue flies its 162-seat Airbus jets mainly from
New York to Florida, California and Upstate New York. Its "anchor airports" are
Kennedy, Washington Dulles and Long Beach, Calif..
"It's no secret we're
interested in Chicago — and I mean O'Hare, not Midway Airport," says Dave Ulmer,
JetBlue's vice president for planning. JetBlue wants to steer clear of Southwest
and ATA airlines at Midway. JetBlue also has been talking to Boston Logan, where
Delta, American and US Airways dominate and where gates used to be almost
impossible to get.
Rather than just watch its competitors, JetBlue has
taken cues from history, studying 20-year-old federal data on where defunct
low-fare pioneer People Express flew in the 1980s and how many passengers those
cities produced. JetBlue also weighs local support when picking cities. "We've
been approached by at least 100 airports," says Ulmer. "We've got mugs, T-shirts
and mouse pads from all over the country."
The smaller Embraer jets are
headed for midsize markets that have ties to New York, as well as for large
cities JetBlue might like to serve several times a day, such as Minneapolis,
Houston or Detroit. Benefiting most from JetBlue's Embraer order are cities in
the Northeast, Southeast and Midwest that are captives of major airlines or
their regional carriers today. Although it's not saying which airports its small
jets might enter and when, those on a top-25 list include Columbus, Ohio;
Greensboro, N.C.; Memphis; Milwaukee; Kansas City; and Portland,
Ore.
Southwest: Keeping mum
Discount leader Southwest, profitable
for 30 years, will grow at a slower pace than the other two but will continue to
exert the biggest influence on fares nationwide because of its size. Based in
Dallas, it flies Boeing 737s to 59 airports in or near large
cities.
Southwest is mum as usual about which new cities it's eyeing. It
plans to expand at Baltimore, where it will have 26 gates by 2005, up from 19.
Chief Financial Officer Gary Kelly says St. Louis, where Southwest already
flies, is "potentially a tremendous opportunity." Improved bookings and fares in
recent weeks have prompted Southwest to move up deliveries of several 737s; 42
will come online next year, up from 34.
Kelly says Southwest will add at
least one city next year. It will also continue "connecting the dots," as Kelly
puts it, linking its East Coast airports to its strongholds along the West
Coast. Last fall, Southwest launched its first non-stop transcontinental service
from Baltimore to Los Angeles, then added Baltimore-San Jose, Calif., and
Baltimore-San Diego this year. Today, the airline serves Las Vegas from
Baltimore and Upstate New York. And it flies to Phoenix from six East Coast
airports from New England to Florida.
Kelly says Southwest, which built
its business on flying to less-congested alternate airports, isn't ruling out
any airport if it can make the math work.
That seems to be the new mantra
of this breed of airline. Says AirTran CEO Leonard: "Nothing's off-limits
anymore."
 |
| How AirTran, JetBlue and
Southwest have grown and where they're headed: |
| AirTran |
|
2000 |
2003 |
20081 |
| Jets |
51 |
67 |
158 |
| Departures2 |
294 |
408 |
900 |
| JetBlue |
| Jets |
5 |
44 |
173 |
| Departures2 |
24 |
186 |
520 |
| Southwest |
| Jets |
324 |
379 |
567 |
| Departures2 |
2,600 |
2,800 |
4,252 |
| 1 USA TODAY
estimates; 2 Average daily departures;
Sources: Airlines listed | |
|
 |
| Plane tickets are often
cheaper on routes where low-fare airlines fly. How some
top domestic markets compare where low-fare airlines
captured small and large passenger shares in 2002: |
| Market (includes all major
airports) |
Low-fare airline passenger
share |
Walk-up fare round trip1
|
| New York to Boston |
0% |
$237 |
| New York to Rochester, N.Y. |
66% |
$435 |
| Boston to Orlando |
4% |
$499 |
| Boston to Baltimore |
50% |
$252 |
| Minneapolis/St. Paul to
Washington |
8% |
$1,390 |
| Minneapolis/St. Paul to Phoenix |
38% |
$762 |
| Detroit to Atlanta |
0% |
$464 |
| Detroit to Tampa/St. Petersburg |
43% |
$236 |
| Los Angeles to San Francisco |
70% |
$213 |
| Los Angeles to Seattle |
11% |
$434 |
1 — For tickets bought
Tuesday for travel Wednesday and Thursday. Sources:
Back Aviation Solutions, USA TODAY research
| |
|
|
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com