[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Canadian government criticized for overcharging on airport security"
Wednesday, December 11, 2002
Canadian government criticized for overcharging on airport security
United Kingdom - The London Financial Times
Members of Canada's governing Liberal Party joined forces with the
opposition in criticizing an airport security charge being levied on all
airline passengers travelling to, from or within Canada.
The Liberal-controlled House of Commons Standing Committee on
Transportation voted in favour of a call to the government to place a
moratorium on the levy -- 24 dollars (15 US) -- on every round-trip
ticket.
The tax -- introduced in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terror
attacks on the United States -- is supposed to pay for the installation
of sophisticated bomb-detecting equipment, and the training and
recruitment of more security personnel at airports.
Instead, the House of Commons committee was told in testimony, many
small airports still do not have the equipment yet their passengers
still must pay the tax.
There have also been objections to the flat tax of 24 dollars which is
applied equally to a local round trip of as little as 100 miles (160 km)
intercontinental flights.
Meanwhile -- according to information received by the committee -- the
special agency handling the security tax and its distribution has
accumulated a surplus of 400 million dollars (250 million US).
But Finance Minister John Manley refused demands to abolish the tax or
even place a moratorium on it.
He repeated previous pledges that he would take another look at the tax
as he prepares for his next budget, due in February.
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?conf=DCConfID8
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com