[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Lawsuit Filed Over California's Mammoth-Yosemite Airport"
Thursday, October 3, 2002
Lawsuit Filed Over Mammoth-Yosemite Airport
Environmental groups re-file their lawsuit against FAA.
By Christina Reed
The Mammoth (CA) Times
A coalition of environmental groups, represented by Earthjustice,
re-filed a lawsuit on Sept. 24 in federal district court in San
Francisco, to force the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to
consider the environmental impacts of the Mammoth-Yosemite Airport
project. The suit seeks to compel an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) on the project.
Environmentalists had put the suit on hold in Aug. 2001 with the
understanding that the FAA would continue to review the project and, at
a later date, issue a final decision on whether further environmental
study was needed. The FAA approved the project in July 2002 without
requiring any further study.
The original Environmental Assessment, and the Subsequent Supplement to
the EIS from the FAA had a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
Environmentalists stated the growth induced by the airport expansion
could also adversely affect the environment.
The Sierra Club, National Parks Conservation Association, California
Trout, and Natural Resources Defense Council brought the lawsuit. The
proposed expansion, according to the environmentalists, would convert a
small, private-airplane facility into a major regional airport, landing
B-737s and B-757s, carrying over a hundred passengers each. Their
concern centered on the projected air traffic and the increased need for
facilities, hotels, condominiums, cabins, restaurants, shopping centers,
rental-car agencies, road upgrades, parking lots, traffic signals, and
other amenities needed to support the extra visitors.
"With this project, Mammoth will be subjected to urban sprawl in a
pristine scenic area close to wilderness and threatened wildlife, " said
local resident and Sierra Club member Owen Maloy. "We already have many
visitors who drive in from Los Angeles and the rest of California. This
project proposes to double the number of visitor-days with tourists
arriving by plane. People still don't have enough information about how
this will change our area. There is risk of destroying the very scenic
values that attract visitors." The local group of the Sierra Club, the
Range of Light Group, has endorsed the lawsuit.
Mammoth Mountain Ski Area currently supports about 1,000,000 skier-days
per year, and the project seeks to "fill up the slow times in the season
and mid-week," said Bill Manning, Mammoth-Yosemite Airport Director. "We
are an FAA commercial airport, and we are capable of handling 757s
today. We can do that now," Manning stated. Manning also explained the
airport is currently configured to handle the air traffic described in
the EIS requirements from 2000, and "larger, fewer, and more-efficient
aircraft are better."
Mammoth Mountain has assisted the Town of Mammoth Lakes by providing
local funding for the proposed project (required under FAA guidelines
for airport expansions), and the Town expects to receive a federal grant
to cover the difference.
"It's a shame we were forced back into court over this issue. The
community is simply asking for a full EIS that would make explicit the
potential costs in terms of additional sprawl, reduced air quality,
traffic, noise, and negative impacts to the aesthetic quality of the
area, so people can make informed choices," said Susan Britton, an
attorney for Earthjustice (representing the plaintiffs).
"Mammoth Lakes is the eastern gateway to such national treasures as
Yosemite National Park, and the John Muir and Ansel Adams wilderness
areas, and is itself a special place, with several unique species and
habitats. A full-blown EIS would address impacts to these resources
resulting from the airport expansion, which the FAA has thus far
ignored," said Michelle Jesperson, spokesperson for the National Parks
Conservation Association.
Background
The Mono County Airport Land Use Commission prepared an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) in 1986, and the EIR addressed the airfield
improvement program started by the county. The project required review
under both the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and by the FAA as the lead
agency. This document was certified by the Mono County Board of
Supervisors in 1986.
The proposed airport project was evaluated in the 1986 EIR/EA, included
in the Airport Land Use Plan for the creation of an Airport Development
District.
The Town of Mammoth Lakes purchased the airport from Mono County in
September 1992, and the 1997 airport-expansion program was
environmentally reviewed in a 1997 EIR. This report evaluated
environmental issues relative to changes in the project proposal, and
new information since 1986. The Town certified the 1997 Subsequent
EIR/EA as adequate. There was no FAA action taken at that time.
In December 2000, the FAA prepared a Final Environmental Assessment
document, and this document contained an environmental evaluation of the
currently proposed project. The Town determined the project would
require a Supplement to the Subsequent EIR (SSEIR) and thereby bypassed
the need to prepare an Initial Study (under CEQA guidelines). The Town
certified the Final SSEIR in March 2002 and recently signed a draft
agreement with the FAA for airport-expansion funding.
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?conf=DCConfID8
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com