[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]
"Lots of guns found at Nevada airports, few fines levied"
Tuesday, September 25, 2001
Lots of guns found at Nevada airports, few fines levied
CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) - The Federal Aviation Administration proposed
fines for just 19 of 112 security lapses spotted at Nevada airports over
the past decade, an Associated Press analysis shows.
The proposed fines - in 17 percent of the Nevada cases compared with a
national average of about 25 percent - were sought mainly from airlines
responsible for hiring airport security crews.
The rest of the Nevada security violations resulted mainly in warning
letters.
The FAA records also show security crews stopped 2,452 people, mostly
passengers, in Nevada airports and made them hand over an array of
banned items.
In half the stops listed in the FAA records from 1990 to 2000, the
contraband was firearms related. That included loaded or unloaded
weapons, stun guns, rifles or ammunition for the weapons.
Other items caught by security personnel ranged from knives to bogus
documents or incomplete paperwork on materials being shipped by air.
In some cases, airline and FAA inspectors tried to get banned items
through security. In other cases, passengers or airport visitors were
carrying the contraband.
About three-quarters of the incidents occurred at McCarran International
Airport in Las Vegas and about a fourth at Reno-Tahoe International
Airport.
The remaining cases - about 1 percent - occurred at smaller airports in
Las Vegas, the Reno area, Elko and Ely.
"It's scary," said Bonnie May, 31, of Duluth, Minn., who flew in to
McCarran last Thursday. "It makes you nervous to fly, to put your life
in other people's hands."
Pam Stevens, 56, of Lakewood, Colo., said she's glad to see security has
been tightened since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the East Coast.
But she added, "I'm just wondering how long before they get lax about
that again."
Of the 112 Nevada security violations that led to proposed fines or
warning letters, the fine proposals totaled $409,068. The FAA won't
release the actual amounts paid. Generally, however, fines are bargained
down during a negotiation process.
America West tallied the highest dollar amount in proposed fines over
the 10-year period, with the FAA suggesting the airline pay $100,333 for
security violations in Nevada.
Of the named airlines, Southwest Airlines was second with proposed fines
of $57,500 in Nevada.
A handful of the cases that resulted in sanctions named the main
airports in Reno, Las Vegas, Elko and Ely. But most named specific
airlines.
Airport officials in Reno and Las Vegas say the airlines were hit with
the proposed fines because it's their responsibility to contract with
companies providing airport security, and lapses by the security firms'
workers were the main cause of the citations.
International Total Services Inc. has the security contract at
Reno-Tahoe International. The Cleveland company just filed for
bankruptcy protection but said its move had nothing to do with the Sept.
11 terrorist attacks in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.
A spokesman for the company, which provides security services across the
United States, didn't return calls seeking comment on the FAA data.
At McCarran International, the security contract is held by Argenbright
Security, based in Atlanta and owned by Securicor PLC of Britain.
Argenbright spokeswoman Sara Jackson said the company is working hard to
ensure its employees understand stringent new FAA directives. "We're
being much more cautious," she added.
"Clearly there's going to be in-depth discussion and debate around the
nation as to what we need to do to provide improved security systems,"
said Reno-Tahoe International Airport spokesman Adam Mayberry.
Asked whether the low number of proposed fines compared with warnings
suggested lax policing by the FAA, Mayberry added, "I think the American
public is going to have to make up its own mind on that."
McCarran International spokeswoman Debbie Millett declined to comment on
the FAA data, other than to say "security is always a priority for us.
It goes without saying."
Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums
http://www.californiaaviation.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?conf=DCConfID8
*****************************************
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com