[Archive Home][Date Prev][Date Next][Index]

         

"Examples of Airline Security Lapses"


 
Tuesday, September 25, 2001

Examples of Airline Security Lapses
Associated Press


Some examples of FAA enforcement actions against airlines for security
violations. Citing security concerns, the agency does not routinely
disclose the amounts actually paid: 

--Trans World Airlines, accused of four security violations for failing
to detect a dynamite bomb, an object commonly used by the FAA to test
the system, slipped past screeners at San Jose (Calif.) International
Airport in August 2000. No penalty imposed. 

--Delta Airlines, failing to screen two passengers and their carry-on
bags before they boarded Atlanta-Salt Lake City flight in September
1999. Paid penalty of $77,000. 

--American Airlines, failing to check passenger IDs, failing to ask the
required security questions at check-in counters and shipping
unaccompanied luggage at several airports in June 2000. FAA proposed
$99,000 penalty; disposition unknown. 

--Continental Airlines, carrying 13 unaccompanied bags on a
Houston-London flight in August 1998. FAA reports that it verified the
airline took action to correct its security procedures. Penalty of
$120,250 proposed; disposition unknown. 

--TWA, failing to perform required background checks on 44 contractors'
screening employees. Airline ordered to remove or reassign screeners in
November 1999. Penalty of $126,750 proposed; disposition unknown. 

--American Airlines, 51 violations of FAA rules covering display of ID
badges by employees at Dallas/Ft. Worth International Airport. Penalty
of $250,000 ordered in February 1998, appealed by the airline and upheld
by administrative law judge.

 Do you have an opinion about this story?
Share it with other readers in our CAA Discussion Forums

http://www.californiaaviation.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?conf=DCConfID8

*****************************************

Current CAA news channel:


Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you have any queries regarding this issue, please Email us at stepheni@cwnet.com